There are 3 most
important information sources about the developments in the world oil markets:
IEA’s Oil Market Report (IEA OMR), OPEC’s Monthly Oil Market Report (OPEC MOMR)
and the US EIA’s reports, particularly Short Term Energy Outlook (STEO). Everyone
who follows the oil markets closely read at least one of those resources,
particularly the world oil supply-demand balance tables those reports,
regularly. Each institution produces those tables in a different format but
they basically contain the similar flows.
To me the best and
most comprehensive source of data is the IEA, at least for the OECD countries
because all the energy statistics are submitted to the IEA by the governments
(legally binding). Quality and definition of the data coverage vary among those
sources.
All the 3 sources
mentioned above provide monthly production data, which are relatively easy to
find. Demand data, however, are provided (usually) quarterly despite more than
half of the countries in the world do not collect quarterly oil demand statistics.
For many countries in the world we do not have yet (as of January 2015) even
the oil demand data for the year 2013. Therefore, whatever you see in those 3
sources for 2013 (logically also for 2014) world oil demand is not more than an
estimate. Then how come we have quarterly or monthly demand figures for 2014?
Good question. God and the people who make up those numbers only know where
they originate from!
Let me put bluntly:
analysts try to interpret the daily sings in oil prices based on available
estimates for oil production in previous month (in poor quality and revised
very frequently) and guesstimates for oil demand in previous quarters. Data for
stock changes in most non-OECD countries, if you believe me, are one of the
wildest guesses that appear in oil supply-demand balance tables. Isn’t that
great?
And yet, we have
been hearing, reading, listening in the media since July last year that the
price of oil continues to collapse as rising supplies collided with weak demand
growth, or prices plunge as oversupply weighs on market. Is that really so? How
do you know? Well, yes, the world oil supply-balance tables indicate so! But at
least half of the numbers in those tables for 2014 are estimates, no?
Let us look at
summary world oil supply-demand balance tables of the IEA, EIA and OPEC, all
released in January 2015. Note that I re-arranged the tables in order to have a
kind of similar main aggregates. I focus only in 2014.
Table: Comparison
of World Oil Supply Demand Estimates
There are a few
quite close matching rows. The first one is OECD demand. Why? Because the
source is the same and IEA data for OECD oil demand, in my opinion, is next to
impossible to challenge. Non-OECD oil demand figures vary as much as 1 mbd
(million barrels per day).
Total supply
figures sometimes do not show processing gains and biofuels production
separately. Therefore you cannot make one-to-one comparison for OECD. But if
you include all biofuels production and processing gain figures into the OECD
line, you get make a rough comparison. What else you can compare is the OPEC
figures. But they do not match at all. Sure, why should they? Even OPEC uses
secondary sources in its world oil supply-demand tables. (Note: According to
secondary sources OPEC crude oil production in 2013 was 30.198 mbd. But it was
31.599 according to the direct communication of OPEC with its members. See
pages 61 and 62 in OPEC MOMR Jan2015. Funny, no?).
Which supply-demand
numbers should we believe? Well, if you take one source alone, you will see
excess supply for each quarter in 2014. BUT if you think that IEA is the most
reliable for world oil demand and OPEC for world oil supply, then you would get
the pink shaded area as balance, i.e., demand is in excess of supply.
Chart: Comparison
of World Oil Supply Demand Estimates
This chart in fact summarizes the situation of the world oil statistics. How sad!
In the next post, I
will dig a bit deeper to show some funny things.
No comments:
Post a Comment